[Dillo-dev] dillo-2.1.tar.bz2

[Michal Nowak]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Jorge Arellano Cid<jcid at dillo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  Working on
>
>    2.- To enable-ssl or not enable-ssl (define what to do).
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:36:39AM +0200, Michal Nowak wrote:
>> [...]
>> Generally speaking for Fedora, we won't turn on options which are not
>> turned on by default in upstream - it usually brings divergence from
>> upstream and comments in upstream mailing lists (not this one :) )
>> like: "That poor distroX turned on --enable-coolness so we are not
>> supporting users of this distro at all."
>>
>> Turning on SSL in upstream means more pressure for fixing it, usually
>> :). But I am reading dillo-dev long enough to know it's not that easy.

[snip]

>
>  Obviously the safe option is not to offer ssl-enabled packages,
> but that will mainly have the effect of no https-dpi at all.
>
>  I'm not quite sure which one would be best.
>  Comments?

http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/dillo2/static/

Looks like Kelson's having some problems with building, so I
patched-rebuilt-installed Kelson's static FLTK2 SRPM and rebuilt
Dillo2. Now there are present i586 pkgs for F-11, both SSL on/off,
tomorrow I can build x86-64 pkgs for F-11 at work. And i386
packs for F-10 (hopefully there's still the F-10 beast in KVM).

(But treat them as third party ones, don't trust them :). )

>
>
> --
>  Cheers
>  Jorge.-
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dillo-dev mailing list
> Dillo-dev at dillo.org
> http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
>